Resource Allocation and Tariff Strategies: Rethinking VAT in the Context of Monopolistic Competition

Nicolas Djob Li Ngue B.

2025

Abstract

We study optimal commodity taxation in an open economy with monopolistic competition and asymmetric scal capacity. In a two-country model, a supranational authority uses destination-based consumption taxes to nance public spending, correct market distortions, and redistribute across countries. We show that in the rst-best, domestically produced goods are always subsidized, while cross-border tax di erentials emerge based on relative labor valuations. In the second-best, when lump-sum transfers are unavailable, the optimal tax system resembles a pattern of asymmetric tari s: goods from countries with lower marginal costs of public funds are subsidized, while more competitive trade directions are taxed. These results challenge the conventional neutrality of VAT under trade liberalization and suggest that di erentiated tax treatment by origin can improve welfare. Our ndings call for a reassessment of uniform VAT regimes, especially in economically asymmetric unions.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{article1,
  author    = {Nicolas Djob},
  title     = {Resource Allocation and Tari Strategies: Rethinking
 VAT in the Context of Monopolistic Competition.},
  booktitle = {2020 IEEE rainbow workshop},
  abstract  = { We study optimal commodity taxation in an open economy with monopolistic
 competition and asymmetric scal capacity. In a two-country model, a supranational
 authority uses destination-based consumption taxes to nance public spending, correct
 market distortions, and redistribute across countries. We show that in the rst-best,
 domestically produced goods are always subsidized, while cross-border tax di erentials
 emerge based on relative labor valuations. In the second-best, when lump-sum transfers
 are unavailable, the optimal tax system resembles a pattern of asymmetric tari s:
 goods from countries with lower marginal costs of public funds are subsidized, while
 more competitive trade directions are taxed. These results challenge the conventional
 neutrality of VAT under trade liberalization and suggest that di erentiated tax
 treatment by origin can improve welfare. Our ndings call for a reassessment of uniform
 VAT regimes, especially in economically asymmetric unions.},
  pages     = {326--329},
  year      = {2025},
  biburl    = {https://domain.com/article2},
}